Our Favorites

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Repeal New Neutrality. Call your congressmen and senators to voice your support for the repeal.




Internet the Future

Net neutrality is a misnomer.  There is nothing neutral about “Net Neutrality”.  

Net Neutrality is government control and government regulation of the Internet.  Most Liberals and Democrats (synonymous)  are so dogmatic and biased they follow the Democratic line even when it’s against their own self interest.  Their position on  Net Neutrality is no exception to this truth.

Answer me this?  How did the internet grow and survive before June 12,2015 when Obama instituted so called Net Neutrality?  

Now let me explain this to you.  On December 14, so called Net Neutrality will be repealed by chairman Pai  (Twitter Pai) and the Trump administration.  On December 15 and thereafter the internet and ISP’s big and small will continue to Thrive.  

Support a truly free internet. Get big government out of the people’s net.




Saturday, December 09, 2017

A Day for Unity and Human Rights but not for Free Speech



"Human Unity by Force not Consent"

You might notice that on the Facebook Post (below) they don't leave anyone the ability to comment. You can only "like" it or "share" it. Facebook doesn't believe in free speech on the political agendas or propaganda they advocate. If they did, they would allow you to comment. If I'm wrong, let them explain why you cannot comment.

This so called "Human Rights Day" is actually not what it appears to be. It is a canard. It is deceptive. What it is, is Big Governments, (with the collusion, endorsement, and propagation by main stream media elite) method of silencing free speech, and duping the people into giving up their own free speech rights. How do they do this? They do this by inventing something called, "Hate Speech" If your country is being overrun by legal or illegal immigrants and you are sick and tired of the increase in violent crimes and rape because of this immigration and the clash of cultures, and you complain about it, or if you protest about it, suddenly you become the criminal. You are accused of "Hate Speech" for asserting your own right to life, liberty and property. You become a criminal for trying to protect your family, your home and home land. No, my friends this is not a simple lovely, sweet, hug your brother or sister day. Facebook and other social media titans of the, one government, one world, "new world order" disseminate this "coom bi ya" bullshit to convince you, to acquiesce (To consent or comply passively or without protest.) This is, without a doubt a sinister, totalitarian plot to take away your right to free speech and more importantly a plot to take away your right to your life and property. Even more brazen is the fact that the government wishes to employ you and have you endorse the very process that will deprive you of your own rights. If you don't believe me ask anyone in Germany who opposes Merkel's policies on immigration or the Swedish governments policies on Immigration or even England's policies on immigration and laws regarding what you can and cannot say about radical Muslims or about the imposition of Sharia law in a Judeo Christian country.



This Human Rights Day that FB is promoting is the one declared by the United Nations over 70 years ago. (Speaking of a corrupt organization, the United Nations is one of the worlds MOST corrupt and controlling organizations.) First of all you have to ask yourself, what has the United Nations done in 70 years? They have spent over One Half a Trillion dollars and what have they accomplished? Have they stopped world famine? Have they brought world peace with their trillion dollar "blue helmeted peace keeping forces"? ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_United_Nations )

Mark Zukkerburg of Facebook doesn't understand history, because he hasn't read history. He is an empty headed techno whiz kid with no foundation in philosophy, history or even a basic understanding of the US constitution. He's never read, John Locke, or Montesquieu, two important philosophers who shaped the US constitution.

What this should be is a day to support your own individual rights. It should be called, "Individual Rights Day", declaring that we all have a God Given, inherent right to "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness." And that we all have a right to our property and the right to protect our life and our property.. Governments don't GIVE you rights. You were born with these rights to your own life, and the ability to grow and foster your property as you see fit. These, rights governments would have you believe are bestowed upon you as gifts from Government. They,are NOT gifts from Governments but these are you inalienable rights given to you by your creator, God, Buddha, Mohammad, whoever you pray to.

Don't "like" or say "yes" to this Human Rights day. Voice your option, read, study, understand the true agenda of the globalists and big government proponents which is to control your life and your property. They think, they know better than you how to live your life and what to do with your money and they are hell bent on doing just that. Controlling you.

Saturday, September 09, 2017

Drained of Empathy




Today I suffered through yet another thinly veiled anti President Trump story by NPR.  That's right another taxpayer funded NPR story on the "Poor".  I am so sick and tired of hearing about the poor.  I am "poured" out of empathy for the"poor".  For 8 years under Obama the "poor" didn't exist.

Suddenly, under a republican administration the "poor" are dragged out again like the Easter Bunny or Ground Hog to adorn the air of NPR and the pages of the New York Times.  Where was the "Poor in New Orleans" Katrina story when Obama was president?     Where was the reporting on the "poor" during the "Chimney Tops Wildfire" in Tennessee  in 2016?  It was non existent.   Did the "poor" receive adequate assistance during "Hurricane Matthew?  How will we ever know and can we sleep at night not knowing?  What did or didn't Obama do for the people of Haiti?   Speaking of Haiti, what did the Clinton's do for the people of Haiti and how much were they paid to "help the poor" of Haiti?
It's called Cherry Picking.  
The left picks the ripest, reddest, shiniest example that supports their narrative, their agenda and they run with it ignoring all other facts.  Please let's dispense with stories of the poor. The "poor" have become just another pawn for the left to manipulate in their never ending quest for power. I call for a moratorium on stories about the poor for the remainder of the President Trump administration, just like the moratorium that existed during Obama's.   I think I am not alone when I say thanks to America's so called "journalists" we have lost our appetite and interest in the "poor".   Let them eat cake at 7-Eleven with their EBT cards

Saturday, August 19, 2017

Is Google Home blocking music with Christian content?


  Least you think I'm a conspiracy theorist you should check out this article in Us News and World report.  Hardly a right wing magazine. US News and World Report  Or just Google the phrase "google has become the internet  censor"  The results are pretty conclusive.  

Additionally, I do know that Google Home isn't or wasn't designed to work outside of the US, Canada or the UK.  My "Google Home" informed me of that when I hooked it up and it detected my IP address.  It said something like, "I might not work or I wasn't designed to work..." but it does work pretty well. However the censorship part about music, really has less to do with Google Home and more to do with who your Google Home is "linked" to,  Pandora, Spotify, or Google Play.  In my case Google Play,  (Which IS designed and advertised to work in Thailand)   I didn't make that clear in my initial post.  The Google Home is just a conduit through which Google Play provides "content". and I think, as I've demonstrated elow also censors that content based on location and, as far as I can tell not for copy-write or licensing issues. I'm pretty sure, "Jesus Loves Me" is public domain. 

Google Home not so friendly to Christian Homes

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Got News

I want to give my full endorsement to a hard hitting, extremely accurate investigative news organization that publishes really newsworthy information you won't find in the mainstream until much later when they are forced to report on it.  These folks don't mess around.  No jive, no hyperbole, just thoroughly  accurate reporting.  Check them out. GotNews

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Not So Perfect





I spoke to a woman friend of mine today.  She told me her sister was getting divorced after 16 years of marriage.  It seems the husband is an alcoholic.  I asked if he beat her or was violent.  (Something even I won't tolerate, with my John Wayne code of ethics.  (John never struck a woman, no matter the cause.)  She said no.  In fact, she portrayed him as a "highly functional alcoholic". (Senior executive at a major corporation with an income over 3 digits) and loving and attentive to their three children.   But, after years of trying, her sister has given up on his evenings of drinking himself, I imagine, to sleep. 

I expressed the usual empathy and condolences on the human condition.  However, I thought, to myself, "And another marriage, another relationship, bites the dust."  

For some odd reason this little vignette of life... this "sound bite" told by an acquaintance stuck with me all day.   I wondered. "What had tipped the scales?"  What had caused her to "give it up" after sixteen years?  In fact, in retrospect, I think I asked her that question and as I remember, there was nothing!   He just wore her down.  Or, maybe she wore him down...I doesn't really matter.

This event brought to mind a story my stepfather told me once about an employee he discovered who was stealing from him.  My father was in the plating business.  Automotive chrome, nickel plating.  The employee was stealing a 100lb canister of pure nickel ingots once a month.

https://www.redspartsattic.com



In the evening around the dinner table my father explained to us what he had discovered and told us how disappointed he was in this man whom he had known for a long time.  He trusted him and considered him a friend.  He had been to our house on weekends and holidays.

We all assumed my father was going to fire the employee but after some thought he decided to keep him and ignore the theft.  He gave us the following explanation: Ed had been with the company for over 12 years.  He was a hard worker.  He showed up for work every day. He knew the business, inside and out.  In short, he could be depended on.   He made money for the company.  Yes, he was a thief.  But, what would it cost my father to replace him and more importantly, what kind of new employee would he get?  One that didn't show up for work.  One that drank on the job.  One that didn't know how to lead and motivate the other workers.   Also, if he confronted him my father new he risked Ed leaving out of shame.  On the other hand he was a thief.  What to do?????
As I said before, all things considered, my father decided to keep Ed.  He dealt with the stealing by keeping track of what Ed stole and calculated the loss into Ed's earnings, rather than giving him a raise.

I reflected on this in the context oh how we decide to give up on relationships.  Obviously, this isn't the thought process Dr. Laura would go through.  But when we give up a relationship of 10, 15, 20 or 25 years because of a defect in that relationship, what do we trade it for?  I think we all might do well to consider that question before we draw a line in the sand...

It seems we're all searching for this nirvana.  This idyllic, romantic notion of relationship borne of a concept we read in books, or were taught in church or  from the cinema or television.  Or maybe, as in my case, it was that little voice inside me that said I could do better.  And maybe that little voice is fueled by all of the sources above.  And maybe, just maybe some of it is crap.    But convinced of that greener grass we move on to achieve something better, finer, truer.   But did I achieve it?  Will I?  I hope so.

Bottom line, maybe... just maybe we (myself included) need to be a little more tolerant, a little more willing to accept a few defects.  Or as Tom Waits once said, "Dreams aren't broken here; they walk around with a limp."  And, hey?  Is that so bad?